Shared Perception: The Ongoing Shift

Blog: Shared Perception: The Ongoing Shift

Picture of Gary M Jordan Co-author of Unlock the Power of Your Perception and Your Talent AdvantageUsually when I sit down to write an article about perception, it is to highlight the ways perception differs from person to person. These differences are, after all, at the heart of what I am most passionate about professionally. Recently, however, I had a very interesting experience.

This experience highlighted how shared perception, that set of sensibilities that people within communities and societies share in common, changes over time as well as what these changes say about us as a society.

Without thinking about it or even realizing it, we experience shared perception – and the way it changes – all the time. When we reflect back on “the way things were”, remember what life was like before computers, iPods, or Facebook, we are talking about how our shared perception has changed. When we complain about how our parents haven’t kept up, what we are really saying is that the shared perception has changed and moved forward, but our parents have, to some extent, opted out.

Changing our perception to participate in the current shared perception is necessary if we are going to function meaningfully in the world, the marketplace, and the primary social structure. But even knowing it is necessary doesn’t always make it pleasant or, perhaps, even good.

In 1971 Masterpiece Theater began airing a series called Upstairs Downstairs which chronicled the lives of an aristocratic family, the Bellamys, and their household servants. Although it began slowly, by the second season it had everyone’s attention both here in the US and in England where it was filmed. I didn’t get hooked until the third season, but I well remember looking forward to Sunday evenings, when I’d watch the intrigues of the Bellamy household.

Recently, while looking through Netflix searching for a good TV series to watch with my wife, I stumbled upon Upstairs Downstairs once again. To my delight, the series, although dated in the style in which it was filmed, holds up quite well in terms of story and character. As with any good drama, every episode contains a crisis or event with conflict and tension.

What I found interesting is that each week’s drama was resolved in a much more genteel manner and with much less ‘damage’ than I expected. I began pondering how each crisis, though fraught with disastrous possibilities, never ended anywhere near as badly as I feared it would. Now you might counter with the idea that the show was merely portraying the English upper class in all their understated and reasonable nobility, and that was the reason for the lack of profoundly tragic endings.

I might have agreed with you was it not for another current TV series, Downton Abbey.

Although bigger in scale, Downton Abbey and Upstairs Downstairs chronicle much the same era with much the same content – English nobility, their household servants, and the changes caused by world tensions, shifting sensibilities, and World War I. Like Upstairs Downstairs, there is a weekly crisis or conflict, and like Upstairs Downstairs it is often solved during each week’s drama. The biggest differences, however, are in how the dramas unfold, the level of friction between characters, and the explicit depiction of the consequences and outcomes.

I am not comparing the two to create an argument about which of the two dramas most accurately depicts the WWI era in England, but because of the differences in expectations of viewing audiences that have occurred in 40 years. Quite simply, I think Upstairs Downstairs is more ‘pleasant’ in its view because the shared perception of the early seventies would not have allowed for the explicit nature of Downton Abbey. In the early 1970s, Upstairs Downstairs was edgy in its examination of English nobility. Now, it could easily be viewed as “quaint”. That cannot be said of Downton Abbey – at least not in 2012!

So what changed and why? We did, or more precisely, our shared perception did.

In the forty years between these two series we have lost some innocence. At every level, we have been exposed to entertainment, news, and media that is more graphic and explicit in every way. This may well be inevitable. I don’t know, although a review of history would suggest that it has always been this way.

Many of the changes that have occurred because of this march forward are clearly for the better, but I often find myself wondering what price we have paid for the ‘progress’. Part of that comes from my age and the fact that I realize there are parts of the shared perception that I am already opting out of. Part of it comes from my fear about what kind of world my children and grandchildren (none yet!) will live in. What I do know is that these kinds of changes to the shared perception are real and they are not going to stop. Ah, if only things could go back to the way they were, to that simpler time of Upstairs Downstairs – before Downtown Abbey!

Share your thoughts on this topic in the comment section below.

To find out more about the services we have available to help you find the success you want and deserve go to

© Vega Behavioral Consulting, Ltd., All Rights Reserved


About Dr. Gary M. Jordan, Ph.D.

Gary Jordan, Ph.D., has over 35 years of experience in clinical psychology, behavioral assessment, individual development, and coaching. He earned his doctorate in Clinical Psychology from the California School of Professional Psychology – Berkeley.  He is co-creator of Perceptual Style Theory, a revolutionary psychological assessment system that teaches people how to unleash their deepest potentials for success. He’s a partner at Vega Behavioral Consulting, Ltd., a consulting firm that specializes in helping people discover their true skills and talents.  For more information, visit

For additional information on Dr. Gary Jordan, please click here

Add Comment:
Please login or register to add your comment or get notified when a comment is added.
1 person will be notified when a comment is added.